Skip to Content

Bloom Energy Corporation

Company Name Bloom Energy Corporation
Stock Symbol BE
Class Period February 27, 2025 to July 08, 2026
Lead Plaintiff Motion Deadline September 28, 2026

Submit Your Information

If you suffered a loss on your Bloom Energy Corporation investments or would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. Please note that submission of this form does not by itself form an attorney-client relationship nor does filling out this form mean you have joined any lawsuit.

Shares Purchased

Number of Shares Buy Date Price Per Share Add

Shares Sold

Number of Shares Sell Date Price Per Share Add

Background

On July 8, 2026, at approximately 1:00 p.m. EST, Hunterbrook Media published a report alleging, among other things, that “Bloom is, in fact, reliant on Chinese scandium, according to global trade data, Chinese corporate filings, satellite imagery, and Hunterbrook’s messages with Bloom’s suppliers in China.” The report states “Hunterbrook traced four separate China-linked routes into Bloom’s supply chain — scandium oxide shipped directly to its Delaware plant, plus scandium-bearing ceramics and powders flowing through intermediaries in Thailand, Japan, and South Korea.”

On this news, Bloom’s stock price fell $15.28, or 5.7%, to close at $254.29 per share on July 8, 2026, thereby injuring investors.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that Bloom Energy obtained scandium through intermediaries who sourced the metal from China; (2) that, as a result, the Company understated the extent to which it relied on scandium from China; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. 

Submit Your Information