Digimarc Corporation

Background

Company Name	Digimarc Corporation
Stock Symbol	DMRC
Class Period	May 03, 2024 to February 26, 2025
Lead Plaintiff Motion Deadline	July 08, 2025

Submit Your Information

If you suffered a loss on your Digimarc Corporation investments or would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. Please note that submission of this form does not by itself form an attorney-client relationship nor does filing out this form mean you have joined any lawsuit.

First Name*

Middle Initial

Last Name*

Email*

Phone*

If representing a Corporation, Trust, Partnership or other entity, Name of Entity

If representing an Entity, Position at Entity

Mailing Address

City

State/Province

ZIP/Postal Code

Country

Are you a current or former employee of the company?

Did you purchase any shares before May 03, 2024?

Shares Purchased

Number of Shares	Buy Date	Price Per Share	Add
Purchased quantity	Purchased month Purchased day Purchased year

Shares Sold

Number of Shares	Sell Date	Price Per Share	Add
	Sold month Sold day Sold year

Additional Comments

Background

On February 26, 2025, after market hours, Digimarc released its fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial results, reporting a 10% drop in quarterly subscription revenue and a decrease in annual recurring revenue by approximately $2 million. The Company explained that the declines “primarily reflect[ed] a $5.8 million decrease in ARR due to the expiration of a commercial contract in June 2024.”

On this news, Digimarc’s stock price fell $11.65, or 43.1%, to close at $15.39 per share on February 27, 2025, thereby injuring investors.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that a large commercial partner would not renew a large contract on the same terms; (2) that, as a result, Digimarc would renegotiate the large commercial contract; (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s subscription revenue and annual recurring revenue would be adversely affected; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Submit Your Information