Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.

Background

Company Name	Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.
Stock Symbol	GO
Class Period	August 05, 2025 to March 04, 2026
Lead Plaintiff Motion Deadline	May 15, 2026

Submit Your Information

If you suffered a loss on your Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. investments or would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. Please note that submission of this form does not by itself form an attorney-client relationship nor does filling out this form mean you have joined any lawsuit.

First Name*

Middle Initial

Last Name*

Email*

Phone*

If representing a Corporation, Trust, Partnership or other entity, Name of Entity

If representing an Entity, Position at Entity

Mailing Address

City

State/Province

ZIP/Postal Code

Country

Are you a current or former employee of the company?

Did you purchase any shares before August 05, 2025?

Shares Purchased

Number of Shares	Buy Date	Price Per Share	Add
Purchased quantity	Purchased month Purchased day Purchased year

Shares Sold

Number of Shares	Sell Date	Price Per Share	Add
	Sold month Sold day Sold year

Additional Comments

Background

On March 4, 2026, Grocery Outlet announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2025, including that the Company had “made the difficult decision to close 36 locations.” Management admitted that “it's clear now that we expanded too quickly, and these closures are a direct correction.”

On this news, Grocery Outlet’s stock price fell $2.45, or 27.9%, to close at $6.34 per share on March 5, 2026, thereby injuring investors.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) the Company had “expanded too quickly” into new stores; (2) the Company’s purportedly strong financial and operational growth was being artificially supported by excessive rapid store expansion; (3) as a result, the Company was unable to achieve the sustainable growth required to meet its previously set guidance; (4) the Company’s Restructuring Plan would require further Optimization to achieve its operational goals, including significant store closures and asset write-downs; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Submit Your Information