Skip to Content

Medpace Holdings, Inc.

Company Name Medpace Holdings, Inc.
Stock Symbol MEDP
Class Period April 22, 2025 to February 09, 2026
Lead Plaintiff Motion Deadline June 08, 2026

Submit Your Information

If you suffered a loss on your Medpace Holdings, Inc. investments or would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. Please note that submission of this form does not by itself form an attorney-client relationship nor does filling out this form mean you have joined any lawsuit.

Shares Purchased

Number of Shares Buy Date Price Per Share Add

Shares Sold

Number of Shares Sell Date Price Per Share Add

Background

On February 9, 2026, Medpace released its fourth quarter 2025 financial results, revealing a book-to-bill ratio of 1.04, well below the Company’s guidance of 1.15. The Company attributed the miss to backlog cancellations being “the highest they’ve been in over a year.”

On this news, Medpace’s stock price fell $84.30, or 15.9%, to close at $446.05 per share on February 10, 2026, thereby injuring investors.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants: (1) consistently oversold the Company's projected book-to-bill ratio for fourth quarter 2025; (2) knew or recklessly disregarded the impact that cancellations have on the Company's book-to-bill ratio; (3) frequently claimed that the projection of a 1.15 book-to-bill ratio for fourth quarter 2025 was reasonable and achievable and that cancellations were not a sign of a weak business environment; (4) reassured investors that the Company was not concerned about the lack of diversity in its pre-backlog; (5) stated that, despite the uptick in metabolic growth, the Company's upside was broad-based and not isolated to any handful of studies; and (6) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Submit Your Information