Tronox Holdings PLC

Background

Company Name	Tronox Holdings PLC
Stock Symbol	TROX
Class Period	February 12, 2025 to July 30, 2025
Lead Plaintiff Motion Deadline	November 03, 2025

Submit Your Information

If you suffered a loss on your Tronox Holdings PLC investments or would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. Please note that submission of this form does not by itself form an attorney-client relationship nor does filling out this form mean you have joined any lawsuit.

First Name*

Middle Initial

Last Name*

Email*

Phone*

If representing a Corporation, Trust, Partnership or other entity, Name of Entity

If representing an Entity, Position at Entity

Mailing Address

City

State/Province

ZIP/Postal Code

Country

Are you a current or former employee of the company?

Did you purchase any shares before February 12, 2025?

Shares Purchased

Number of Shares	Buy Date	Price Per Share	Add
Purchased quantity	Purchased month Purchased day Purchased year

Shares Sold

Number of Shares	Sell Date	Price Per Share	Add
	Sold month Sold day Sold year

Additional Comments

Background

On July 30, 2025, Tronox released its second quarter 2025 financial results, revealing a significant reduction in sales for its TiO2 product, citing “softer than anticipated coatings season and heightened competitive dynamics.” Additionally, the Company revised its 2025 financial outlook, lowering its full-year revenue guidance and reducing its dividend by 60%.

On this news, Tronox’s stock price fell $1.95, or 37.9%, to close at $3.19 per share on July 31, 2025, thereby injuring investors.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company was ill-equipped to adequately forecast demand for its pigment and zircon products or otherwise minimize the impact of potential demand fluctuations; (2) the Company continued to promote its lofty margin projections which relied upon continually increased sales volumes in its pigment and zircon division; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Submit Your Information