Verra Mobility Corporation

Background

Company Name	Verra Mobility Corporation
Stock Symbol	VRRM
Class Period	February 24, 2026 to May 26, 2026
Lead Plaintiff Motion Deadline	August 04, 2026

Submit Your Information

If you suffered a loss on your Verra Mobility Corporation investments or would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. Please note that submission of this form does not by itself form an attorney-client relationship nor does filling out this form mean you have joined any lawsuit.

First Name*

Middle Initial

Last Name*

Email*

Phone*

If representing a Corporation, Trust, Partnership or other entity, Name of Entity

If representing an Entity, Position at Entity

Mailing Address

City

State/Province

ZIP/Postal Code

Country

Are you a current or former employee of the company?

Did you purchase any shares before February 24, 2026?

Shares Purchased

Number of Shares	Buy Date	Price Per Share	Add
Purchased quantity	Purchased month Purchased day Purchased year

Shares Sold

Number of Shares	Sell Date	Price Per Share	Add
	Sold month Sold day Sold year

Additional Comments

Background

On May 26, 2026, Verra disclosed that it had received a termination notice from Avis Budget Group regarding its contract. The Company accordingly lowered its full year 2026 financial outlook.

On this news, Verra’s stock price fell $9.23, or 70.6%, to close at $3.85 per share on May 27, 2026, thereby injuring investors.

On June 1, 2026, Verra announced that its President and Chief Executive Officer had been terminated as “the Board determined that a change in leadership [was] needed[.]”

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Verra’s optimistic plan for continued growth in its Commercial Services business was dependent on its relationship with Avis, and in particular obtaining a contract extension with Avis Budget; (2) the Company minimized concerns that major RACs could replace Verra with in-house solutions or outsourced alternatives, making Verra’s 2026 full year guidance increasingly unlikely to be met; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Submit Your Information