Skip to Content

Direct Action/Opt-Out

Class members in a securities class action (see Class Action) have the right to opt out of the class action, even after a settlement is reached, and pursue a direct action against the company, which is separate from the class action. Opting out means that the investor is not bound by the court’s decisions in the class action, but it also means that the investor does not get a share of any recovery obtained in the class action. Instead, in the direct action, the investor pursues his or her own securities case against the company.

Direct actions may provide substantial benefits, including greater control over the litigation, and a larger potential recovery than that achievable in the class action.

Opting out is a difficult decision to make, but it may be the right decision for an investor with substantial losses that determines he or she would like to pursue the benefits of a direct action. Many factors should be considered when determining whether to opt out, including: the existence of additional theories of recovery not alleged in the class action, the existence of additional defendants not named in the class action, and the unique trading history of the potential opt-out investor.

The securities attorneys at Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP are willing and able to provide guidance to investors who are considering opting out of a class action, or pursuing a direct action.

Court Recognition

“And without question, the Court is of the opinion that the value of benefit that’s been conferred to the class is extremely sizable and that this Court is certainly aware that the skill and efficiency of plaintiff’s counsel is what attributed to this settlement, and they are learned securities counsel. The Court is mindful of that, and as a result they were able to sort of weed their way through the complex issues in this case, and also to bring this about — bring about a settlement rather in short order as these matters go. So the Court certainly attributes that to counsel’s skill and efficiency, as well as the ability to work with the adversaries in this matter.”

–Hon. Susan D. Wigention, U.S. District Judge, District of New Jersey

“Class Counsel has conducted the litigation and achieved the Settlement in good faith and with skill, perseverance and diligent advocacy”

— Hon. Donovan W. Frank, U.S. District Judge, District of Minnesota

“The court finds that the Settlement Fund… created by Class Counsel is an exceptional result… The settlement is significantly above the average securities class action settlement when measured as a percentage of losses recovered… The court finds that Class Counsel, particularly Co-Lead Counsel, exerted tremendous effort on behalf of the class in the prosecution of this action… The Court finds that Class Counsel skillfully prosecuted this action, particularly given that this case was unusually complex relative to most securities fraud class actions. ”

–Hon. Dickran M. Tevrizian (Ret.), U.S. District Court Judge, Central District of California

More Testimonials