Skip to Content

Breach of Contract

Contracts are used in all areas of life to define the relationship between parties and provide certainty in our dealings.  When one party to a contract does not follow through with its side of the deal, however, the consequences to the other party can be great.

There is no question that big businesses have the advantage in our contractual dealings.  When consumers purchase goods and services they are provided long complex documents which are difficult to understand and which they have no power to change.  Such agreements are known as “contracts of adhesion” and often contain illegal or unfair terms.  In addition, some businesses simply ignore certain terms and/or change their contracts without notice, unilaterally altering the deal after the fact.  Consumers are often left helpless.    

At Glancy Prongay & Murray our expert contract attorneys are ready, willing and able to help level the playing field.  We will analyze the meaning of your agreement and whether your rights have been violated.  We will also perform a damages analysis to determine the harm you have suffered and potential remedies.  Whether your dispute is with a service provider such as a telephone or cable company, a bank or other financial institution, a retailer or car dealership, or some other entity, we are here to help.

Court Recognition

“And without question, the Court is of the opinion that the value of benefit that’s been conferred to the class is extremely sizable and that this Court is certainly aware that the skill and efficiency of plaintiff’s counsel is what attributed to this settlement, and they are learned securities counsel. The Court is mindful of that, and as a result they were able to sort of weed their way through the complex issues in this case, and also to bring this about — bring about a settlement rather in short order as these matters go. So the Court certainly attributes that to counsel’s skill and efficiency, as well as the ability to work with the adversaries in this matter.”

–Hon. Susan D. Wigention, U.S. District Judge, District of New Jersey

“Class Counsel has conducted the litigation and achieved the Settlement in good faith and with skill, perseverance and diligent advocacy”

— Hon. Donovan W. Frank, U.S. District Judge, District of Minnesota

“The court finds that the Settlement Fund… created by Class Counsel is an exceptional result… The settlement is significantly above the average securities class action settlement when measured as a percentage of losses recovered… The court finds that Class Counsel, particularly Co-Lead Counsel, exerted tremendous effort on behalf of the class in the prosecution of this action… The Court finds that Class Counsel skillfully prosecuted this action, particularly given that this case was unusually complex relative to most securities fraud class actions. ”

–Hon. Dickran M. Tevrizian (Ret.), U.S. District Court Judge, Central District of California

More Testimonials